Which role is typically used in a review process?

In the context of a review process, the role of the author is crucial because this individual is responsible for creating the work product that is being reviewed. The author brings valuable insights into the content, purpose, and context of the material, which fosters constructive feedback and assessments from reviewers.

During a review, the author can clarify intentions, answer questions, and provide explanations about the content. This engagement helps ensure that the feedback given by reviewers is relevant and focused, ultimately leading to a more effective review process. The author plays a pivotal role in facilitating discussion and understanding among the review team, thereby enhancing the quality of the final product.

In contrast, roles like champion or custodian may not directly participate in the creation or revision of the work being reviewed, and the project sponsor typically focuses on overarching project management and resource allocation rather than details of individual reviews.