Which of the following proposals is most recommended for test automation?

The recommendation for in-sourcing based on a local company's training and specialist knowledge reflects a strategy that emphasizes utilizing the expertise and insights of team members who are familiar with the specific system under test. This approach has several advantages.

First, local specialists possess firsthand knowledge of the application, its design, and its nuances—insights that are often critical for effective test automation. By leveraging their understanding, you can create more relevant and targeted automated tests that accurately reflect the system's requirements and potential user interactions.

Second, in-sourcing allows for better communication and collaboration within the team. When team members are working together, they can quickly address any issues that arise and are in a better position to adapt tests as the application evolves. This immediacy helps maintain the quality of testing and ensures that the automation remains aligned with ongoing development.

Additionally, investing in training and development of local resources builds long-term capability within the organization. It fosters a culture of continuous improvement and knowledge sharing, which is vital for both testing and development processes.

Overall, this approach not only optimizes the immediate testing efforts but also strengthens the team's overall automation competency for future projects.