Which is least likely to be used as a technique to identify project and product risks?

Inspections are typically used for evaluating and assuring the quality of specific deliverables, such as documentation, code, or tests, rather than for identifying project and product risks. The primary purpose of inspections is to catch defects and ensure that the product meets established standards and requirements through a thorough review process. While inspections can sometimes reveal issues that may lead to risks, they do not focus on identifying potential risks in the broader context of the project or product.

In contrast, brainstorming sessions, expert interviews, and independent assessments are specifically designed to identify risks. Brainstorming involves collaborative thinking where a team generates ideas to uncover potential risks based on diverse perspectives. Expert interviews leverage the knowledge and experience of specialists who can provide insights into potential risks based on their expertise. Independent assessments bring an objective viewpoint, often revealing risks that may not be apparent to those directly involved in the project.

Thus, while inspections play a crucial role in quality assurance, they are less aligned with the proactive identification of risks compared to the other techniques listed.