Which is least likely to be used as a technique to identify project and product risks?

Inspections are primarily focused on evaluating work products to ensure they meet specified requirements and standards. This technique is typically used in the context of quality assurance and involves a detailed examination of documents, code, or other deliverables to identify defects or to verify compliance with requirements. While inspections can uncover issues related to the product, they do not specifically aim to identify risks associated with the overall project or product strategy.

In contrast, brainstorming, expert interviews, and independent assessments are techniques that actively seek to uncover potential risks and uncertainties. Brainstorming encourages collaborative idea generation that can highlight various project or product risks. Expert interviews leverage the knowledge of individuals with specialized experience to identify risks that may not be immediately apparent. Independent assessments provide an objective view of the project’s risk profile, ensuring that external factors and perspectives are considered.

Thus, while all these other approaches are geared towards identifying risks, inspections focus more on validation and verification rather than risk identification itself. This clarity distinguishes inspections from the more risk-oriented techniques mentioned in the other choices.