What is one of the benefits of using systematic test design techniques?

The choice highlighting the targeting of specific types of faults is correct because systematic test design techniques are explicitly structured to identify particular error patterns or defects within a system. These techniques often rely on predefined criteria and models that allow testers to systematically explore the software's functionality. By employing these approaches, such as equivalence partitioning or boundary value analysis, testers can effectively focus their efforts on areas most susceptible to certain kinds of faults, improving the likelihood of uncovering hidden defects that might otherwise not be detected.

The systematic approach contrasts with experience-based testing methods, which may rely more on the tester's intuition and prior experiences, potentially missing certain defect types that a structured technique would specifically target. Through the use of systematic techniques, testing becomes more focused and efficient, aiming for a higher rate of defect discovery in critical areas of the application. This targeted approach ultimately enhances software quality while providing a more robust framework for testing processes.

In relation to the other options, while they have their own merits, they do not encapsulate the primary benefit of systematic test design techniques as directly as targeting faults does.