What is an appropriate measure of test coverage when a business requests a weekly progress report?

The most appropriate measure of test coverage in this scenario is the percentage of business requirements exercised. This metric directly reflects how well the testing aligns with the business needs and objectives, which is crucial for stakeholders to understand the progress of testing in the context of meeting the requirements that drive the project.

By focusing on the percentage of business requirements exercised, the report provides valuable insight into whether the testing efforts are adequately covering the critical functionalities that are important to the business. This information is essential for stakeholders, as it indicates the level of risk associated with the untested business requirements and helps to inform decision-making regarding project timelines, resource allocation, and any necessary adjustments to the testing strategy.

The other measures mentioned, while potentially relevant in different contexts, do not directly address the effectiveness of the testing in relation to the specified business requirements. For example, tracking the percentage of planned hours worked simply reflects the amount of work done, but not its alignment with business goals. Similarly, the percentage of countries that have test scenarios and the percentage of test iterations completed might provide some indication of coverage but do not specifically tie back to how many of the actual business requirements have been addressed in testing. Thus, focusing on the business requirements provides a clearer picture of testing progress in a meaningful and